"Invention is the most important product of man's creative brain. The ultimate purpose is the complete mastery over the material world, the harnessing of human nature to human needs."
Answer: A trademark is any name, logo, device, sound, color or design that identifies the source or origin of one’s goods/products and distinguishes them from those of others.
Answer: A service mark is any name, logo, device, sound, color or design that identifies the source or origin of one's services and distinguishes them from those of others. For purposes of this document we use the term "trademark" to include both trademarks and service marks.
Answer: A trade name is a name that refers to a business entity, i.e., a company. A name can function as both a trademark and a trade name, depending on how it is used. For example, "LegalStar® intellectual property software" is use of the word LegalStar as a trademark, whereas, "This software was developed by LegalStar of Williamsville, New York," is use of the name LegalStar as a trade name to identify the company. Trade names are not federally registrable although some states do permit registration of trade names.
Answer: Trademark rights arise from use in the United States, i.e., he or she who is first to use a trademark in commerce in a particular geographic area has rights superior to those who use the same mark, (or a mark which is so similar that it is likely to cause confusion among ordinarily prudent consumers), subsequently. In trademark law terms, the senior user has superior rights to the junior user. Thus, under the common law, where rights arise from use, businesses are in the often-untenable position of being in a race to use their trademarks in geographic territories before their competitors use competing marks in the same territories.
Answer: Although the definition of use in commerce is defined by statute, clarified by case law, and not entirely dispute-free, the short answer is that use in commerce implies that the mark has been used in a trademark sense, i.e., placed on a tag, label, product, or literature accompanying a product, and then shipped to a bona fide customer. For federal registration purposes, "use in commerce" means commerce that Congress is empowered to regulate under the Constitution of the United States, i.e., commerce between states (interstate commerce), commerce between a state and an Indian reservation. Use of a mark in advertising is not generally "use in commerce" for a trademark, although it may be "use in commerce" for a service mark. Use of a mark only in intrastate commerce (only within one state) will not suffice for federal registration of a mark, but such use would form the basis for a state registration of a trademark.
Answer: Federal registration of a mark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) serves as constructive use of the mark in commerce everywhere in the United States as of the filing date of the application for registration. Federal registration establishes the registrant's ownership of the mark, and the registrant's right to exclusive use of the mark in commerce. It also places the public on notice of the registrant's rights. A federal registration provides a basis for suing infringers in federal court. Registration also places the mark in a database searched publicly and privately by others, who may find your mark and avoid adopting the same or a similar mark for their goods or services. Federal registration also enables you to use the “circle R” (®) notice, which advises the public of your trademark rights and tends to legitimatize your goods and/or services. Federally registered trademarks are important and valuable assets of a company.
Answer: In order to be federally registrable, the trademark cannot mislead or deceive the public, and cannot be likely to cause confusion among an appreciable number of ordinarily prudent consumers in view of previously registered marks. The mark to be registered cannot be merely descriptive of the goods or services, cannot be primarily a surname, primarily geographically descriptive, or deceptively misdescriptive.
Answer: If your use of your mark is merely intrastate, you can apply for state registration, which offers added protection to your common law rights. The state registration process is also usually faster and less expensive than federal registration – but – you get what you pay for, and federal registration should always be sought where available. Professional searchers first try to identify where the pertinent documents are likely to be found – which haystacks – or classes and sub-classes – should be searched, and then they try to look at each and every document in each and every pertinent class and sub-class. They also do keyword searching, but this method isn't always dispositive. Perhaps a rose by any other name would smell as sweetly, but you won't find a widget in the patent database if someone called it by another name, which is quite possible when you consider that nearly half of all patent applications filed with the USPTO each year are filed by foreigners. You should also appreciate that a prior publication anywhere in the world can prevent you from getting a patent. It doesn't have to be a patent document – it could be a book, magazine article, academic article, etc. There are more than 200 countries with patent systems, and not all of these systems are searchable at the USPTO Public Search Room. Moreover, not all patent application are published, and even those that are published are not published immediately (U.S. applications that are published are published 18 months after filing). There is always a risk that someone has already applied for a patent for your invention, or for a similar invention that might prevent you from patenting.
Answer: Initially, a trademark examining attorney at the USPTO decides whether your mark is federally registrable, after conducting a search of previously registered marks, and considering other legal requirements. Refusals to register can be appealed to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) and, ultimately, to a federal district court or to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Answer: The right to use a trademark in commerce is decided by a court of law. In the case of common law rights and state trademark registrations, disputes may be decided by state courts. Disputes involving federal registrations and other federal questions under the Lanham Act are decided by federal courts.
Answer: Trademarks are categorized in descending order of distinctiveness as follows:
Arbitrary or Fanciful: These are the strongest marks. An arbitrary mark is a mark that has nothing to do with the goods it is used to identify (e.g., "Apple" for computers). A fanciful mark is a made-up word (e.g., "Kodak" for film). While arbitrary and fanciful marks are the strongest, they are also the most expensive from a marketing and advertising perspective, as great effort and expense must be incurred to educate the public as the relationship between the mark and the goods.
Suggestive: A suggestive mark is a mark that suggests, but does not describe, the goods (e.g., "Sea Breeze" for air conditioners, suggests the goods without actually describing them). These are probably the most popular trademarks as they strike a compromise between legal strength and marketing/advertising value and expenditure.
Descriptive: A descriptive mark describes some characteristic, ingredient or function of the product (e.g., "Super Steel Radial" describes steel-belted radial tires). Little is left to the imagination with a descriptive trademark. Marketing and advertising departments in companies typically love descriptive trademarks as they immediately tell the world what the product is. Legal departments (trademark attorneys) dislike descriptive marks because they offer little legal protection. It is difficult to obtain exclusive rights in descriptive marks. Moreover, if a mark is held to be "merely descriptive" it is not federally registrable, which means that anyone can use the mark. Descriptive marks are not federally registrable on the Principal Register unless the applicant can demonstrate secondary meaning, i.e., that the consuming public has come to associate the mark with a source or origin of the goods.
Generic: Generic terms cannot be reserved as trademarks. You can't reserve the term "race car" for race cars and prevent others from using the term to describe race cars. It is very important that trademark owners protect their rights by policing use of their trademarks to avoid generic use. It is possible for a descriptive, suggestive, arbitrary, or fanciful mark to become generic through improper use, resulting in a total loss of trademark rights (e.g., "yo-yo" was adjudged generic in 1963; other trademarks adjudged generic include linoleum, aspirin, and cellophane). Ever wonder why restaurants and drive-through attendants always ask you, "Is Coke® O.K.?" or "Is Pepsi® O.K.?" It's only partly that they care about your sensitive taste buds! It's mostly that the trademark attorneys don't want the famous soft drink trademarks Coke and Pepsi to become generic for cola flavored soft drinks.
Answer: It's not possible to say that one is better than the other, they are just different! In general, word marks often, but not necessarily, offer the strongest legal protection, followed by composite marks, and then by logos/designs. If your budget is limited, and you have to choose which mark to register first, we would generally advise registering in the order described above, but every case is different, and there are exceptions to every rule. The rationale for the priority described above is that it is usually easier for competitors to create logos and designs that won’t infringe your mark than it is for them to find a word mark that doesn’t infringe. Since composite marks by definition have multiple components, your competitors usually have an easier time avoiding infringement of a composite mark than a word mark.
Answer: You should have a search done and an opinion rendered by a competent trademark attorney. You should understand that there are two different rights at issue – the right to register your mark, and the right to use your mark. These are separate and distinct issues and you should be concerned with both of them. It may be possible to use a trademark in commerce but not to be able to federally register that mark, and vice versa.
Answer: In general, your mark is available for federal registration if it is not likely to deceive, mislead, or cause confusion among ordinarily prudent consumers in view of previously registered trademarks. Moreover, the mark cannot be merely descriptive, generic, primarily a surname, primarily geographic, or deceptively misdescriptive, nor can the mark be scandalous or immoral.
Answer: In general, your mark is available for use if it is not likely to cause confusion among ordinarily prudent consumers in view of marks previously used in the geographic territory where you plan to use your mark. Remember that a mark that has been federally registered is considered to have been constructively used throughout the United States as of the date the application for federal registration was filed.
Answer: The Examining Attorney considers likelihood of confusion against the backdrop of the so-called duPont factors, recited herebelow:
• The similarity or dissimilarity of the marks in their entireties as to appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression;
• The similarity or dissimilarity and nature of the goods or services as described in an application or registration in connection with which a prior mark is in use;
• The similarity or dissimilarity of established likely-to-continue trade channels;
• The conditions under which and buyers to whom sales are made, i.e., "impulse" vs. careful, sophisticated purchasing;
• The fame of the prior mark (sales, advertising, length of use);
• The number and nature of similar marks in use on similar goods;
• The nature and extent of any actual confusion;
• The length of time during and conditions under which there has been concurrent use without evidence of actual confusion;
• The variety of goods on which a mark is or is not used (house mark, "family" mark, product mark);
• The market interface between applicant and the owner of a prior mark: (a) a mere "consent" to register or use, (b) agreement provisions designed to preclude confusion, i.e., limitations on continued use of the marks by each party, (c) assignment of mark, application, registration, and good will of the related business, (d) laches and estoppel attributable to the owner of the prior mark and indicative of lack of confusion;
• The extent to which the applicant has a right to exclude others from use of its mark on its goods;
• The extent of potential confusion, i.e., whether de minimis or substantial; and,
• Any other established fact probative of the effect of use.
Answer: In assessing likelihood of confusion, it is important to know that there are thirteen different Circuit Courts of Appeal in the United States, and the federal district court where the case is brought determines which Circuit's law applies. Although the laws of each circuit are similar, there are some subtle and important differences from circuit to circuit, and these differences may be important in deciding where to commence litigation. Every circuit has its own version of the duPont factors for likelihood of confusion. The Second Circuit assesses likelihood of confusion according to the so called Polaroid factors, recited herebelow:
• The strength of the mark;
• The degree of similarity between the two marks;
• The proximity of the products;
• The likelihood that the prior owner will bridge the gap;
• Actual confusion;
• The reciprocal of defendant’s good faith in adopting its own mark;
• The quality of defendant’s product; and,
• The sophistication of the buyers.
Answer: There are two main reasons why a company should have a search conducted and an opinion rendered on the availability of a trademark for use and registration:
1. Before product launch, you should know if the mark you have selected is free for you to use and register. If you don’t have a right to use the mark in commerce, another may sue you for trademark infringement, collect money damages, and/or force you to change your product name. If you don't have a right to federally register your mark, absent common law rights, you may not be able to prevent others from using a confusingly similar mark in commerce.
2. If, in the worst case scenario, you are sued for trademark infringement, you may be susceptible to paying an increased damage award if the plaintiff can prove that your infringement was intentional. One of the best defenses to a claim of intentional trademark infringement is an opinion letter from competent trademark counsel advising that the selected mark is available for your use.
Answer: A preliminary screening search is conducted on the USPTO web site and seeks to determine identical marks already registered for the same or very similar goods. This search is relatively inexpensive to conduct. The trademark attorney is looking for what we call "an exact knock-out," but we are not searching for similar marks, only identical marks. The point of this type of search is to save the expense of a full search and opinion if possible. No competent trademark attorney would ever render an opinion on the positive availability of a mark for use and registration based on a preliminary screening search. The preliminary screening search considers only federally registered marks or applications therefor. A full trademark search, on the other hand, is conducted by an independent search company, and includes not only identical marks, but similar marks as well. A full search includes federal marks (applications and registrations), state marks, common law marks (marks in use but not registered), trade names, domain names, and marks litigated in courts of law.
Answer: Because the preliminary screening search only considers identical federally registered marks or applications therefor – it does not consider marks that are similar to the proposed mark, nor does it consider state registrations, common law marks, domain names, or trade names.
Answer: The USPTO charges a filing fee of $275 per class. Our legal fee is disclosed upon an initial consultation.
Answer: It generally takes between 1-2 years to prosecute a trademark application. Prosecution expense varies, depending upon what resistance is encountered during prosecution, but it may cost approximately $1,000 from beginning to end, assuming that no appeal is necessary and no third party opposes the registration.
Answer: Prior to November 16, 1989, an applicant for federal registration of a trademark had to first use the mark in commerce. A so-called conventional trademark application is filed after the applicant has already used the trademark in commerce. If the mark has not yet been used in commerce, the applicant can file an intent-to-use (ITU) application, as long as the applicant has a bona fide good faith intent to use the mark in commerce. ITU applications are examined in the same manner as conventional applications, i.e., the examining attorney does a search and examines the application to determine if the subject mark of the application is likely to cause confusion in view of previously registered marks, and also considers the other statutory requirements for registration. However, before an ITU application can mature to registration, the applicant must use the mark in commerce and submit a statement with the USPTO attesting to such use. The USPTO charges a fee to receive this statement of use.
Answer: Yes – there are many deadlines associated with the prosecution of a trademark application, some prescribed by the Code of Federal Regulations, others by statute, and still others by treaty. Our firm uses a sophisticated docketing software application to track these due dates and keep our clients informed of progress with their applications. We use experienced paralegals to keep track of the due dates and generate correspondence to keep our clients informed.
Answer: The application is first assigned a serial number and then assigned to a law office for examination. Within the law office, an examining attorney is assigned to examine the application. The examining attorney conducts a search and evaluates the trademark in view of the law and previously registered trademarks. The examining attorney may issue an office action refusing registration on any of several grounds. If this happens, the applicant has 6 months to file a timely response to the office action. This process may be repeated until a final determination is made by the examining attorney to either allow the application to mature to registration, or be denied registration. The applicant can appeal a final decision to refuse registration to the TTAB. If the examining attorney decides the mark is registrable, the mark is published in the Official Gazette of the USPTO, and third parties have 30 days from the date of publication to oppose the proposed registration. If opposed, a proceeding takes place before the TTAB to resolve the opposition. This is essentially a litigation within the Patent Office, and can be expensive to carry out. If unopposed after publication, the application matures to registration.
Answer: An intent-to-use application can't mature to registration until a statement of use is filed with the USPTO, attesting to use of the mark in commerce. In an ITU application, at the conclusion of the publication period, the examining attorney issues a Notice of Allowance, and the applicant is given 6 months to file a statement of use. The applicant can buy five 6-month extensions of time to file the statement of use, for a total of 3 years after the Notice of Allowance to file the statement. The first extension of time is given without cause, but subsequent extensions are given only when the applicant has shown good cause for the extension.
Answer: A cancellation proceeding is a proceeding similar to an opposition proceeding, except it seeks to cancel an existing registration. There are several grounds for commencing a cancellation proceeding, including an allegation that the registrant has abandoned the registered mark, or that the petitioner enjoys rights in the mark superior to those of the registrant.
Answer: Each country has its own trademark law and procedures. Our firm maintains a relationship with a network of international law firms, and we work cooperatively to secure trademark rights for our clients in foreign countries.
Answer: Yes – the United States is a member of the Paris Convention, and applicants for federal registration in the United States have six months to file a corresponding application in a member country and enjoy the benefit of the U.S. filing date.
Answer: You may use the ® designation once the registration issues. You may not use it prior to registration.
Answer: Yes – registrants must file a declaration of use between the 5th and 6th year after registration in order to keep the registration from being cancelled. Another declaration must be filed within a year of each renewal (between the 9th and 10th year after registration).
Answer: You should always use your mark as an adjective, never as a noun. Your mark should be affixed to your goods, or to labels affixed to your goods, or to literature accompanying your goods. The mark should be prominently displayed on or proximate the goods. You should remember that use of a trademark in advertising is probably not use of a mark in commerce (unless it's a service mark), so you should be sure to properly mark your goods with your mark as they are shipped in commerce.
Answer: Federal trademark registrations now last for 10 years, and are renewable indefinitely, so long as the registrant continues to use the mark in commerce.
Answer: The Section 8 Declaration is a declaration of use filed between the 5th-6th and 9th-10th year after registration, and between the 9th – 10th year of each subsequent term.
Answer: The Section 15 Declaration of Incontestability may be filed anytime after the mark has been registered for 5 years and after the mark has been in use in commerce for 5 consecutive years. Incontestability of a mark provides significant legal benefits.
Answer: Several companies offer "watch" services to monitor use and application activity of others. We can arrange to engage these services for you.
Answer: Trademark infringement occurs when a junior user uses a trademark, service mark, or trade name in a way which is likely to cause confusion among an appreciable number of ordinarily prudent consumers in violation of the rights of a senior user.
Answer: You should immediately consult trademark counsel to discuss strategy in resolving the matter. You should not attempt to resolve the matter without benefit of counsel as doing so may jeopardize your valuable intellectual property rights.
Answer: You may use the ™ notice at any time. The notice has no statutory basis, but is commonly used to notify the public of your trademark. It is not clear what legal significance the notice has.
Answer: No, no, and no! The online trademark application forms are deceptively simple. They make it look easy – like it's just a matter of filling out some forms and submitting them to the Patent and Trademark Office. But the process is anything but simple. There are pitfalls for the unwary in filling out the application itself – how the goods or services are described, for example. Even if your application passes the minimum requirements, how will you handle your first Office Action, when the Examining Attorney refuses registration based on a likelihood of confusion or because she feels your mark is merely descriptive? Some experienced trademark attorneys won’t take over a case filed pro se. Others charge a premium for doing so. Some pro se trademark application filers do so without benefit of a search or opinion. This is almost always a bad way to proceed. Trademark law is so subjective, and so laden with pitfalls for the unwary, that it is always a good idea to entrust this part of your business to a professional.
Answer: Experience, experience, experience!!! In selecting trademark counsel, you should ask how many trademark applications, opinions, searches, oppositions, cancellations, and litigations the attorney has handled, and the attorney's success rate. You can check out the attorney yourself at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office web site, by searching by attorney name or firm name among trademark applications and registrations. Ask to speak to clients of the attorney you are considering. Ask general attorneys in your area who they would recommend for trademark work.